What is happening here? Well, Your Economist has three theses on what’s going on. And three antidotes.
No guarantees. But these three potions should let an eligible man or two appear.
]]>There are several situations where we find a high gender ratio: some countries (last week we discussed China), some immigrant communities, social groups and others. Economists have studied several of these and have found 5 outcomes in the relationship world when women have the upper hand.
In other words, based on robust evidence: bargaining power for women is a pretty good thing, for about everyone.
]]>Dear Emma,
Well spotted. Much of the economic literature we apply to dating is indeed ‘non-gendered’ and gives the same advice to men and women. It looks like we are contradicting dating advice of the Mars and Venus kind.
But not quite. Economists have sometimes even assigned extreme gender roles. Lena Edlund rose to fame for a paper that assumed women were ‘sellers’ and men ‘buyers’ of sex, whether in a lifelong contract (marriage) or a temporary one (prostitution). The assumption is that women’s relative indifference to sex gives them a bargaining advantage.
Even if we want to take it a bit easier, the idea that women are sellers and men buyers in the dating game is not counterintuitive, and Dr de Bergerac found it to resonate with friends and family. Several successfully dating ladies reported the following activities as useful: putting up their profiles at online and other dating agencies, making sure they are socially active and well known (also see this article) and paying attention to their overall visual appeal. Exactly what a seller would do.
Try it out and let us know how it goes.
All the best,
Dr de Bergerac
]]>