A week ago, @LisettePylant\u2019s account of a six-fold date made headlines in DC. Justin Schweiger had booked six dates in 20-30min slots on a single evening. Basically, he tried to speed date unilaterally, and without announcing that he was doing so. The women noticed rather quickly, got together without him and became friends. Ms. Pylant exposed the experience on twitter. It was later featured in other outlets including the Washington Post<\/a>.<\/p>\n

First of all, this is quite wonderfully hilarious. Guy thinks the world about his own efficiency (and attractiveness?) and finds himself outmaneuvered before you can say \u2018think..\u2019. I guess, in future, Justin will only be able to date people who are either masochists or don\u2019t read (the media) and he may or may not enjoy that situation.<\/p>\n

What was going on here?<\/p>\n

\n
1. That gender ratio<\/strong>. Why was he able to do that \u2013 one man, six women. Aren\u2019t the women too busy, including with other dates? Or does that reflect the actual gender ratio in DC? \u2013 Well, 1:6 is a bit strong, but single women do outnumber single men in most neighborhoods in DC, as Holly Thomas blogs here<\/a>. This situation\u00a0is still current, and typical for the metropolitan areas of the East Coast. (For an eloquent analysis of gender ratios in the modern American dating world, see Jon Birger<\/a>.)<\/li>\n
2. The ladies cracked the code<\/strong>. Contrary to much coverage on the event, I fail to find Justin Schweiger especially shocking. Most thinking ladies over 18 have encountered creepy behavior in the dating world at some point; sadly, it\u2019s hardly news. What is new is that this one got public coverage \u2013 and that the women\u00a0outdid the effect in solidarity. That is, by the way, the code to crack in skewed gender ratios: solidarity. Standing together as women and refusing to compete on standards. The principle has been well-known to economists\u00a0for a long time, it is the good old-fashioned\u2026.trade union. It outdoes unequal (power) ratios by bundling individual demands.<\/li>\n
3. What now<\/strong>? While spontaneous and elegant, the ladies\u2019 get together and agreement were indeed a budding trade union, from an economics point of view. (Not that trade unions can’t\u00a0be spontaneous and elegant.) I would much encourage to continue on that principle and draw up a charter of standards in dating that DC women are not willing to do without. The more women subscribe, the less the gender ratio will be felt. Being the only date during one evening could be one standard, for example; or the only one, at all, before things get cozy. The bar will be as high as you set it, and firmer if many agree on it.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

   A week ago, @LisettePylant\u2019s account of a six-fold date made headlines in DC. Justin Schweiger had booked six dates in 20-30min slots on a single evening. Basically, he tried to speed date unilaterally, and without announcing that he was doing … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[59,6,13,29,205,49,87,68,74,37,23],"class_list":["post-548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-commitment","tag-date","tag-dating","tag-gender","tag-gender-ratio","tag-loveonomics","tag-match","tag-relationship","tag-trust","tag-waiting-for-sex","tag-women"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=548"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/548\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":549,"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/548\/revisions\/549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dateconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}